One might argue that the phonological inventory of Gothic is a spectacularly bad match for that of Modern English. But then again, so was the phonological inventory of Latin.

I think you can, so long as you hold your nose and write vowels as a one to one match with Modern English; you’re not really going to get anything sensible otherwise.

• /f/ and /v/ aren’t differentiated, and they weren’t differentiated in Old English either; we could write <v> as <f>, or <u> or <w> or as <90> (which is a spare letter).
• No <tʃ> (our <ch>), and not much of a soft <c> either. We can press the <x> character into service for one or both.
• No /dʒ/ (our <j>; the Gothic <j> is our <y>). We could give up and make <j> ambiguous between /dʒ/ and /j/, or we could write /w/ as <ƕ> (wh), reuse <w/y> for /j/, and move <j> to /dʒ/. Yuck.
• No /ð/, but that’s ok, <th> is already ambiguous within English.
• No /ʃ/, just as there isn’t one as a letter in English (<sh>). I guess we won’t avoid h-digraphs after all.

… So, yeah, you *could* write English with the Gothic alphabet, but it would be quite awkward in places, and it would not do English justice. Where there’s a will there’s a way, I guess, but it would certainly not be child’s play. Every sentence would have some lack.

Or, to put that last paragraph in Gothic:

… so, jeah, jou kould write english wiþ þe goþik alfabet, but it would be qite awqard in plases, and it would not do english jhustise. ƕere þeres a will þeres a waj, i guess, but it would sertainli not be xilds plaj. eweri sentense would hawe some lakk.

[math]unicode{x2026} unicode{x10343}unicode{x10349},[/math] [math]unicode{x1033E}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10337},[/math] [math]unicode{x1033E}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}[/math] [math]unicode{x1033A}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10344}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10334}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10332}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10337}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10338}[/math] [math]unicode{x10338}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10332}unicode{x10349}unicode{x10338}unicode{x10339}unicode{x1033A}[/math] [math]unicode{x10330}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10346}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10331}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10344},[/math] [math]unicode{x10331}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10339}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10331}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10335}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10344}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10330}unicode{x10345}unicode{x10335}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10339}unicode{x1033D}[/math] [math]unicode{x10340}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10343},[/math] [math]unicode{x10330}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10339}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10349}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10333}unicode{x10349}[/math] [math]unicode{x10334}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10332}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10337}[/math] [math]unicode{x1033E}unicode{x10337}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10344}unicode{x10339}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10334}.[/math] [math]unicode{x10348}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10338}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10343}[/math] [math]unicode{x10330}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10339}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x1033B}[/math] [math]unicode{x10338}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10343}[/math] [math]unicode{x10330}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10330}unicode{x1033E},[/math] [math]unicode{x10339}[/math] [math]unicode{x10332}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10343},[/math] [math]unicode{x10331}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10339}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10343}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10344}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10339}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10339}[/math] [math]unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10349}unicode{x10344}[/math] [math]unicode{x10331}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10347}unicode{x10339}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}unicode{x10343}[/math] [math]unicode{x10340}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10330}unicode{x1033E}.[/math] [math]unicode{x10334}unicode{x10345}unicode{x10334}unicode{x10342}unicode{x10339}[/math] [math]unicode{x10343}unicode{x10334}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10344}unicode{x10334}unicode{x1033D}unicode{x10343}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10345}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033F}unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10333}[/math] [math]unicode{x10337}unicode{x10330}unicode{x10345}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x10343}unicode{x10349}unicode{x1033C}unicode{x10334}[/math] [math]unicode{x1033B}unicode{x10330}unicode{x1033A}unicode{x1033A}.[/math]

BYZANTINE-IRANIAN RELATIONS

In the realm of belles lettres exchanges seem to have been limited to romantic and didactic tales. […] The Alexander Romance of Pseudo-Callisthenes was also translated into Middle Persian and became well known in Islamic Persia (Southgate, introd.). […]

Rūm was the setting for the legendary adventures of many Iranian heroes. Goštāsp, patron of Zoroaster, for example, was said to have fled as a young prince to Rūm, where he met and married a daughter of the emperor, who bore him the paladin Esfandīār (Šāh-nāma, Moscow, VI, pp. 20ff.; Ṯaʿālebī, pp. 245-56; cf. Boyce, pp. 465f.). Šāpūr II was popularly believed to have traveled to Constantinople in disguise but to have been recognized and imprisoned; he escaped and de­feated Julian, forcing him to accept a humiliating peace treaty (this story, as incorporated in the Syriac Julian Romance, was repeated in Islamic sources: Nöldeke, 1874). A love story was woven around Šarvīn Daštābī, whom Yazdegerd I supposedly sent to Constantinople as tutor to Theodosius II (see above; Mīnovī, 1954, pp. 75-76).

The successor to Rage Against Quora that I don’t run:

• Bug? or Feature?

Best-ofs for language related answers:

• Conversance: A Language Blog
• Conversance: English

Good answers get stored up in many a blog; the most consistent of these is:

• Sophokagathia

For knowing what’s going on from Quora’s side in general, refer to the compilation in:

• Ed’s Harvest of Blogs by Nick Nicholas on The Insurgency

I’m going to take a long time to say “none”.

Glottal stop – Wikipedia

The most common convention in Latin script is indeed to use apostrophe; and the disadvantage of the apostrophe is that it’s easy to miss, easy to conflate with a quotation mark, and it doesn’t look like a “real” letter. The same goes for patched apostrophes, such as the ʻOkina <ʻ> and the Modifier letter right half ring <ʾ>, or the spacing grave <`>. In fact, many writing systems end up making it optional. The status of the Hamza <ء> in Arabic script is also diacritic-y—by contrast with Hebrew, where aleph ⟨א⟩ is its own letter (when it’s not being a Mater lectionis).

Within Latin script, some alphabets have indeed plugged in distinct letters instead; from Wikipedia, Maltese and Võro use <q>, Malay uses <k>, and a few languages use <h>. That is not a universal solution though. Likewise, some Cyrillic alphabets use Palochka <Ӏ>, but in other alphabets that character is used as an ejective diacritic. (And yes, ejectives are also notated with apostrophes.)

The IPA symbol has begotten the Glottal stop (letter) <ʔ> with lowercase ⟨ɂ⟩ as a letter in Canadian indigenous languages. Wikipedia reports a 2015 case where women in the Northwest Territories demanded the right to use <ʔ> in their daughters’ names. (What’s in a Chipewyan name?) The Territory’s computers, of course, were Latin-1 only. <ʔ> often ends up rendered ad hoc as <?>, as you’d expect; and of course, that’s even worse than using an apostrophe, because everything treats it as punctuation.

ASCII Arabic (Arabic chat alphabet) renders the hamza as the lookalike <2>. Not a scalable solution either.

Voiced pharyngeal fricative – Wikipedia

This is a rarer sound cross-linguistically, but one that contrasts with the glottal stop in Arabic. In Chechen, it’s an allophone of the Palochka letter; in Avar it’s the digraph <гӏ>. Somali, as Joseph Boyle’s answer notes, uses <c>. Arabic has the Ayin <ع> for the phoneme, and in Hebrew it is also traditionally <ע>—although most Hebrew-speakers pronounced that now as a glottal stop.

ASCII Arabic renders the ayin as the lookalike <3>, which is just as bad as <2>. Arabic transliteration into Latin uses variants of apostrophes: <ʿ>, superscript <[math]^c[/math]>, <`>—with lots of ensuing confusion with the hamza; and of course, they are usually left out in transliterations anyway:

In loanwords, ʿayin is commonly omitted altogether: Iraq العراق al-ʿIrāq, Oman عمان ʿUmān, Saudi Arabia العربية السعودية al-ʿArabiyyah as-Saʿūdiyyah, Arab or Arabic عربي, ʿArabī, Amman عمان ʿAmmān, etc.

… Nope. No good options. It’s enough to make you give up and dump IPA symbols into your Romanisation—or the unchanged Arabic letters.

Aside from being a rhetorical question, it is also a Conventional Implicature: the primary meaning of the phrase is “this is obvious”, even though this is not the literal meaning of the phrase, and that meaning replies from Gricean maxims of conversation. (“What does ursine defecation have to do with my question as a counterquestion? Ah, it is a vividly expressed exemplar of something obvious…”)

(See Nick Nicholas’ answer to How is it possible that we perceive irony? for more on Conventional and Conversational Implicatures.)

The term got to be a conventional implicature, in turn, by virtue of being vivid language, which sticks as a mental image. In particular, it is an instance (literally) of scatology.

A good question, and I hope to hear more stories from others.

Hamartia is about viewing your life as an Aristotelean tragedy. So,

The Decalogue of Nick #2: I’ve trained as a linguist, and I have done computational linguistics stuff by Nick Nicholas on Opɯdʒɯlɯklɑr In Exile

Scratch me just a little bit, and I will lament the defining woe of my life, that I did not become a professional linguist: Nick Nicholas’ answer to What is your personal experience with obtaining a linguistics degree?

And the fatal flaw of the hero in Ancient Greek tragedy is more often than not hubris, arrogance.

Well, here’s the arrogance part:

• Where did you hope the degree will take you? To being a tenured academic, lecturing with adoring audiences at my feet, writing 20 papers a year, and living the dream.

But more insightful is this answer: Nick Nicholas’ answer to What are your 3 worst mistakes? Would you fix any of them if you could go back in time?

And, perhaps most critically, I wasn’t prepared to leave Australia and spend the rest of my life hunting for the next tenure-track gig, like some modern day wandering minstrel. I knew myself—not just what I’d been brainwashed to be: what I actually was. I needed to lay down roots. I needed a sense of place.

[…] That Cavafy poem? He titled it Che fece… il gran rifiuto.

He left out two critical words in the Dante verse he was quoting. Che fece per viltade il gran rifiuto. He who made the grand refusal—through cowardice.

Was I a coward? Yeah. But I was also being me.

My hamartia was not so much arrogance, in the end, as fear of instability.

Trump Hasn’t Killed Comedy. He’s Killed Our Stupid Idea of Comedy.

The thing about “Ooh! Look at us! We’re such taboo-breakers!”, as Michaelis Maus will tell you, is that “Radical” is the new Conservative: it’s breaking obsolete taboos that not many people are fussed about anymore, and it’s not breaking the actual current taboos that matter. And patting itself on the back for it.

The alt-right are vile? Why yes. Historically, when you violate a taboo, that makes you vile! Taboos are there for a reason.

Money quote:

Comedy, evidently, is neither necessarily moral nor inevitably liberal. Andrew Anglin, a neo-Nazi blogger, has linked trolling to “culture jamming,” a late 20th-century wave of anti-consumerist media pranks. Mark Dery, who introduced the term to the mainstream with a 1990 essay in the New York Times, replied in a 2016 interview that Anglin’s tactics are actually a “bastardized form of cultural jamming” because they “discredit the official narrative” and “suggest a false equivalency between viewpoints and positions where there truly is a right and a wrong.” Never mind that the whole point of culture jamming was to discredit the official narrative: Anglin’s culture jamming must be wrong because it targets the wrong people. This is like saying that a gun is not a real gun because it was used in a homicide.

Which is not to suggest that racist trolling, like murder, is ever justified—just that it’s still a species of humor. A bad joke is a joke, just as Der Ewige Jude is a movie. Trolling, culture jamming, and deceit may currently be the comic armaments of people you don’t like, but it hasn’t always been this way. (Remember: “We called them lies.”) And comedy’s survival may depend on it not being so again.

In Greek, pipa “smoking pipe” (cf. Blandine Meyrieux-Lefevre’s answer for French), or tsimbouki “hookah pipe” < Turkish çubuk.

That was a Google Image search for “hookah pipe”. Let’s just say that doing a Google Image search in a public place for τσιμπούκι was a mistake…

As τσιμπούκι – SLANG.gr informs me (Hi, Melinda!), the Turkish çubuk has not picked up that connotation. The Turkish equivalent is boru ‘pipe’ or saksafon.

tsimbouki has also picked up the secondary meaning of ‘extremely difficult’; Προσπαθώ να λύσω μια άσκηση αλλά είναι πολύ τσιμπούκι “I’m trying to solve this exercise, but it’s very blowjob”. πίπα – SLANG.gr reports for pipa the secondary meanings ‘nonsense; fiasco; something of low quality’.

Linguistic sexism. It really blows…

Other terms reported over at slang.gr: κλαρίνο – SLANG.gr “clarinet” (Northern Greek, usually with reference to losing soccer teams); Wiktionary adds γλειφιτζούρι “lollipop”.

Originally Answered:

Why aren’t trending topics appearing in Quora now?

Changes to Trending Topics by Abhinav Sharma on Quora Product Updates

Pidgins have limited vocabularies, because they are by their nature sparse languages, and pidgins sound like colonial language babytalk, because paternalism. And some of the more amusing Pidgin coinages, we can be reasonably sure, are the colonials poking fun at the natives yet again, rather than genuinely used circumlocutions.

Such as, for example, the notorious pseudo-Bislama expression for a piano (Vanuatu: Important Phrases):

Wan bigfala blak bokis hemi gat waet tut mo hemi gat blak tut, sipos yu kilim smol, hemi singaot gud.

Literally; One big fella black box, him he got white tooth and (or more/in addition to) him he got black tooth, suppose you kill him small (strike or hit lightly) him he sing out good.

Yeah… no, as we would say in Australia.

There’s also the obfuscations about obfuscation itself:

Urban Dictionary: Eschew Obfuscation, Espouse Elucidation

“Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the circumscriptional appelations are excised.” (William Mann & Sandra Thompson, Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation, 1987.)