Is it really that bad to bring your daughter when talking to foreign diplomats and people of power?
Why stop there? Why not bring the in-laws? And your cousin Vinny, who just loves sushi?
Is it really that good to bring your daughter along? What are her qualifications for being there? What is the reason for bringing her instead of a seasoned diplomat? And what perceptions does it raise about your judgement, be she qualified or no? Claire Underwood was not intended as a blueprint for US governance.
The Donald may or may not work out why established politics has put in the ringfences it has. The Donald’s supporters ditto.
But yes, there is a very good reason why nepotism is considered a bad thing. Over and above the lack of security clearance. And there’s a very good reason why conflicts of interest are meant to be both avoided, and to be seen to be avoided. Presidents get a salary precisely to avoid that perception.
It’s this little thing called corruption. You know. The kind of thing that has been happening a little less blatantly in DC all these years. The kind of thing Trump was voted in to drain the swamp of, ostensibly.
Actually, US politics stopped being fun for me for a decade now, so I’m surprised I’m even wading in here. But though I am a staunch republican [Australian definition], I really must defend the dignity of the monarchy against my confrere Michael Masiello (who has wisely turned off comments on Trump answers).
That is not what constitutional monarchs do. That’s not even what absolute monarchs do, really.
That’s what banana republics do.