Preemptive Real Name block?

Look, this is probably a bug, and I’ve already reported it as such, but you never know.

Jess H Brewer is now Quora-User-2318, Jess H. Brewer. And Jeremy Glenesk is now Quora-User-2331, Jeremy Glenesk.

Nothing in their edit logs indicates they are being busted for a Real Name violation. In fact, Jess Brewer’s profile. has the blue tick of a verified user.

So this is a bug.

Surely.

EDIT: A number of weirdnesses happened on 2017–03–28, including this, a post disappearing from The Insurgency, and one of the people here’s answers ending up misattributed to another—before an outage that lasted hours. Seems like Quora’s database(s) were corrupted.

Why is my question about Pegah Esmaili’s ban being deleted instantly instead of posted?

What Heather Jedrus said: Heather Jedrus’ answer to Why is my question about Pegah Esmaili’s ban being deleted instantly instead of posted?

Because they always delete questions asking why a specific user was banned. One reason is for the privacy of that person. There are probably other reasons as well.

Edited to add: There’s no way to get a really good answer to a question like that. Quora will never give any kind of official answer, the banned person isn’t able to answer, and everyone else is just guessing. I think answers to questions like that are at a high risk for BNBR violations and are likely to mostly be rumors and gossip.

All true. The instadelete is odd, but as Sierra Spaulding pointed out in comments (https://www.quora.com/Why-is-my-…), questions about bans are reported vigilantly by Quora users, and most of them are deleted quickly. Quick reporting is likelier.

See:

See also:

I have, after a lot of hesitation, started posting users’ own statements as to their bans on Necrologue. BNBR still applies there, as does a ban on speculation. Users’ own statements, I believe, are exempt from that.

*I* believe.

Should anonymous questions about real people be automatically removed from Quora?

Given the handiwork and calibre of bots we see around us on Quora every day, no question about *anything* should be automatically removed.

Besides. As we are told, all anonymous questions are now being scrutinised by moderation before being published.

😐

If you were allowed to add a symbol to unicode, what symbol would it be, and what would it mean?

I should be recusing myself from this question, because in fact I have added dozens of symbols to Unicode, both as an employee of the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae, and as a tapped on the shoulder expert.

When Asmus Freytag tapped me on the shoulder, though, and said to me “We want to finalise Greek: Suggest all the characters we will ever need, so we can close the book on it”—there’s one decision I made that skipped a character, and that I feel a little bad about.

Unicode Greek includes three archaic characters that I proposed to them:

  • Heta, <Ͱ>, was one way of writing the version of eta that some Greek alphabets used for /h/ instead of /eː/. In fact, most scholars just write it as a Latin <h>, e.g. hιππόλυτος for Hippolytus (Ἱππόλυτος); but you will see the tack symbol used occasionally. (U+0371)
  • The Tsan and Pamphylian Digamma were two different sounds in two different dialects of Greek, that had the same glyph, <ͷ> (U+0377).
  • The Archaic Sampi, <ͳ>, was the use of sampi as a letter of the alphabet, corresponding to σσ—as distinct from the normal use of sampi <ϡ>, as the numeral 900. For example, τεͳαράϙοντα “forty” in Ephesus, corresponding to regular Ionic τεσσαράκοντα. (U+0373)

My compunction comes from what I did with the Pamphylian sampi. To quote Wikipedia:

A letter similar to Ionian sampi, but of unknown historical relation with it, existed in the highly deviant local dialect of Pamphylia in southern Asia Minor. It was shaped like

According to Brixhe it probably stood for the sounds /s/, /ss/, or /ps/. It is found in a few inscriptions in the cities of Aspendos and Perge as well as on local coins. For instance, an inscription from Perge dated to around 400 BC reads: ͶανάͲαι Πρειίαι Κλεμύτας Λϝαράμυ Ͷασιρϝο̄τας ἀνέθε̄κε (=”Vanassāi Preiiāi Klemutas Lwaramu Vasirwōtas anethēke”, “Klemutas the vasirwotas, son of Lwaramus, dedicated this to the Queen of Perge”). The same title “Queen of Perge”, the local title for the goddess Artemis, is found on coin legends: ͶανάͲας Πρειιας. As ͶανάͲα is known to be the local feminine form of the archaic Greek noun ἄναξ/ϝάναξ, i.e. (w)anax (“king”), it is believed that the ͳ letter stood for some type of sibilant reflecting Proto-Greek */ktj/.

I am, temperamentally, a lumper rather than a splitter. It was my decision that the Pamphylian letter was a variant of the archaic sampi, and should be treated as a glyph variant of that codepoint, rather than as an independent codepoint.

[math]huge{ͳ}[/math]

This means I have made life difficult for anyone working on Pamphylian. They will have to commission a different font, with the archaic sampi pointing the other way around. Or, rather more unlikely, commission a font with two variant glyphs for the archaic sampi, and use software that allows them to pick which variant to display. Or just shrug, and use the Ionian glyph instead of the Pamphylian glyph. (Like my Wikipedia cite does.)

Sorry guys.